ProDIGIQ
  • About Us
  • Main Website

Monthly Archives: March 2015

Part 121 Air Carriers will now need a Safety Management System

Posted on March 20, 2015 by ProDIGIQ

This final ruling by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) requires all authorized Part 121 air carriers to create and put into place a safety management system (SMS).

The rule came into effect on March 9th, 2015 and requires Part 121 Air Carriers to begin the process of planning and implementing an SMS. Within six months of the date, air carriers will need to submit their implementation plan to the FAA; then within three years of the same date, have it operating.

The FAA put this ruling into place as part of a concerted effort to improve the safety of air transportation and change the industry’s reactive attitude towards safety into a proactive one.

According to the FAA, the commercial air carrier accident rate has decreased by a great amount in the United States over the past decade – but the FAA discovered a trend of what could have been preventable hazards and accidents. Spurred on by this, part 121 air carrier’s must submit an implementation plan within six months of the final ruling, and implement the SMS proposed by the end of this three-year period.

What goes into a Safety Management System?:

The Safety Management System must have the four major components: safety policy, safety risk management, safety assurance, and safety promotion. These four parts must be fulfilled in order to have a functioning and proper SMS.

Safety Policy requires the air carrier to define safety objectives and commit towards reaching them. It also calls for the designation of an accountable executive who is responsible for the safety performance and management of its operations. This executive and a sufficient management staff will be responsible for the organization, integration, implementation and maintenance of the safety management system.

The safety risk management component is fairly straightforward. It requires air carriers to develop a process of analyzing existing and potential systems, and identify hazards that might impact operations. Once they’re identified, the risk and the possibility is analyzed to determine if it’s an acceptable safety risk or not. If it is not, then methods of risk control must be implemented.

Safety assurance is the method through which “the air carrier will develop and implement processes to monitor the safety performance of its aviation operations,” according to the FAA. It is designed to be a way to monitor and audit operational processes, investigate incidents and accidents, and allow for confidential reporting of hazards and new safety improvements.

Safety promotion is the training of employees and managers to develop the tools needed to communicate necessary safety information. Involvement of employees is vital to the success of an air carrier’s safety management system. Employees must know their responsibilities and duties, and be trained in everything relevant to the safety performance of the air carrier. They must also be made aware of any information resulting from various safety management system analyzes.

The cost of implementing the rule is estimated to be $135.1 million dollars over ten years, but the benefits could be anywhere from $104.9 to $241.9 million dollars across the decade. The benefits depend heavily on the mitigation costs, but they are difficult to quantify.

The FAA has adopted the final rule with a number of minor modifications based on comments. Some of the important changes are as follows:

Scalability:

Scalability was addressed – though the rule was not limited as suggested. The FAA recognized the impact that the rule could make on small businesses. The FAA designed the requirements to be applicable to all air carriers, making sure that all sizes, scopes, complexities and types were covered. 14 CFR 5.3 was revised in order to fit these changes.

Scope:

A number of entities asserted that the rule was too broad and would reach beyond the Federal Aviation Administration’s oversight authority. Commenters suggested that the rule be revised in such a way to limit SMS to areas that would only directly affect aviation activities. The FAA took the comments into account and limited it as such.

The FAA acknowledged that some airports may only use their safety management systems on the narrow range where it is required, and others may expand it beyond that. If an air carrier decides to expand, the FAA will continue to only oversee SMS related activities in accordance with the provision.

Protection of Information under FOIA:

Sixteen organizations raised concerns about SMS data not being protected from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act. The consequence would be that the Federal Aviation Administration’s oversight would be compromised because of the lack of data being submitted to them. Commenters said that the protection of data is vital to ensuring the free-flow of information with the FAA.

The FAA noted that there are already protections afforded to voluntarily submitted reports, data and such under Public Law 112-95 (the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012) – as long as it has been produced or collected to develop and implement a safety management system.

Enforcement:

The FAA was asked to publish its plan for compliance and enforcement. The FAA stated that each SMS would be uniquely designed to meet the needs and wants of each air carrier. Determining compliance will depend on what is needed in each case – meaning discretion will be exercised in deciding how to enact enforcement.

The FAA also acknowledged that a fundamental concept of safety management system is for the air carriers to identify and correct their own noncompliance – which is not a new concept with FAA policy.

There are many more items that were discussed and addressed in the comments and by the FAA – so if these are of interest or affect you, read on in the full final ruling on the topic issued by the FAA here. (January 2015)

Posted in Abstracts, Aviation Industry News, News | Tags: Part 121, Safety Management System, SMS |

Resource Library: SMS Collection 3

Posted on March 7, 2015 by ProDIGIQ

ACRP Synthesis 37:

The Airport Cooperative Research Program’s (ACRP) Synthesis 37 is a collection of lessons learned from Airport Safety Management System (SMS) Pilot Studies.

The goal of the synthesis was to provide U.S. Part 139 airport operators with data and experiences that were learned through the pilot studies, but the lessons could certainly be applied to airports that are safety-minded.

The synthesis covered the management of the pilot program, all findings related to the components of SMS and lessons learned from them, along with challenges and benefits to an SMS with conclusions and trends.

For more information, read the ACRP Synthesis 37. (March 2012)

FAA Office of Airports SMS Desk Reference:

In 2012, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Office of Airports released the Safety Management Systems (SMS) Desk Reference. It’s a massive collection of all the information pertinent to SMS as of 2012.

The Desk Reference is written as a supplement to FAA Order 5200.11 by bringing to light the necessary requirements needed to implement an airport SMS. The reference mostly covers the procedures needed to bring all the components of SMS in line with Safety Risk Management (SRM).

There are a number of sections on general SMS guidance, one on the FAA, airport and state roles and responsibilities when implementing SMS, FAA Airport (ARP) specific implementation of SRM, funding for ARP SRM activities, a description of the ARP SRM Tracking System (SRMTS), and a description of ARP SMS Safety Assurance and Promotion.

For more information, read the FAA Office of Airports Safety Management System (SMS) Desk Reference. (June 2012)

Posted in Abstracts, Aviation Industry News, News | Tags: abstracts, ACRP Synthesis, FAA SMS Desk Reference |

Welcome!

We are a technology company headquartered in Southern California, focused on creating innovative products and services for airports.

Visit our website to see what we can do for you, or read up here on the blog to catch up on industry and company news!

Recent Posts

  • Five Steps for Successful GASB 87 Implementation at Airports
  • Efficient Gate Management is a Must in COVID-19 Pandemic
  • Transforming Wildlife Hazard Management at Airports with Digital Solutions
  • Airport Management Software Helps Airports Adapt to COVID-19
  • Digital Solutions – A Gateway to Long-Term Environmental Sustainability for Airports

Categories

  • Abstracts
  • Aviation Industry News
  • News
  • Our Products
  • Our Services
  • Products and Services
  • Technology
  • Uncategorized

Archives

  • March 2021
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • April 2020
  • April 2019
  • February 2019
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • October 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • March 2016
  • January 2016
  • November 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015

CyberChimps WordPress Themes

© ProDIGIQ, Inc. 2021